Namibia vs Suriname: Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Namibia
0.6809 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.9595 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
127th
Suriname rank
125th

Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Namibia
  • Suriname
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.9595 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.6809 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.2786 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.4 times Namibia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 127th and Suriname ranks 125th of 140 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.036 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7049 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.6689 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0.0461 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.8506 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.8045 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.0592 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.9121 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.8529 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0.0853 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.3 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.2892 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.4992 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.6656 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.4473 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Namibia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.9595 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.6809 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Namibia and Suriname?
0.2786 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Suriname rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Namibia ranks 127th and Suriname ranks 125th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Suriname: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/namibia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/namibia/suriname/">Namibia vs Suriname: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,778 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.