Mozambique vs Tunisia: Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Mozambique
18.01 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
17.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
84th
Tunisia rank
85th

Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Mozambique
  • Tunisia
0510152025196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 18.01 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 17.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mozambique ahead.

Mozambique ranks 84th and Tunisia ranks 85th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 4.97 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.33 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mozambique
1970s 5.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.31 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mozambique
1980s 6.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.98 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 6.59 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.82 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2348 1000 SLC per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 8.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.6811 1000 SLC per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 20.14 1000 SLC per square kilometre 12.83 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7.3 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 19.72 1000 SLC per square kilometre 17.01 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.71 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Mozambique or Tunisia?
Mozambique, at 18.01 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 17.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Mozambique and Tunisia?
0.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Tunisia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Mozambique ranks 84th and Tunisia ranks 85th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Tunisia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/tunisia/">Mozambique vs Tunisia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,778 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.