Indonesia vs Rwanda: Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Indonesia
86,891 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
47,821 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
2nd
Rwanda rank
3rd

Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Indonesia
  • Rwanda
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 86,891 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 47,821 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 39,070 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.8 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Indonesia ranks 2nd and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 9,178 1000 SLC per square kilometre 26,021 1000 SLC per square kilometre 16,843 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 12,870 1000 SLC per square kilometre 36,104 1000 SLC per square kilometre 23,234 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 17,719 1000 SLC per square kilometre 47,900 1000 SLC per square kilometre 30,181 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 26,370 1000 SLC per square kilometre 50,784 1000 SLC per square kilometre 24,414 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 49,900 1000 SLC per square kilometre 51,860 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,960 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 63,919 1000 SLC per square kilometre 46,267 1000 SLC per square kilometre 17,652 1000 SLC per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 82,587 1000 SLC per square kilometre 45,095 1000 SLC per square kilometre 37,492 1000 SLC per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Indonesia or Rwanda?
Indonesia, at 86,891 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 47,821 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Indonesia and Rwanda?
39,070 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Rwanda rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Indonesia ranks 2nd and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Rwanda: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/rwanda/">Indonesia vs Rwanda: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,778 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.