Colombia vs Rwanda: Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Colombia
12,154 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
47,821 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
6th
Rwanda rank
3rd

Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Colombia
  • Rwanda
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 47,821 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 12,154 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Colombia, a difference of 35,667 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 3.9 times Colombia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 140 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 2,508 1000 SLC per square kilometre 26,021 1000 SLC per square kilometre 23,513 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 3,339 1000 SLC per square kilometre 36,104 1000 SLC per square kilometre 32,764 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 4,380 1000 SLC per square kilometre 47,900 1000 SLC per square kilometre 43,520 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 6,021 1000 SLC per square kilometre 50,784 1000 SLC per square kilometre 44,762 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 7,499 1000 SLC per square kilometre 51,860 1000 SLC per square kilometre 44,361 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 9,009 1000 SLC per square kilometre 46,267 1000 SLC per square kilometre 37,258 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 11,503 1000 SLC per square kilometre 45,095 1000 SLC per square kilometre 33,592 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Colombia or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 47,821 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 12,154 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Colombia and Rwanda?
35,667 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Rwanda rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Colombia ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Rwanda: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/colombia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/colombia/rwanda/">Colombia vs Rwanda: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,778 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.