Chile vs Jamaica: Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Chile
6,856 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
5,381 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
8th
Jamaica rank
10th

Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Chile
  • Jamaica
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 6,856 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 5,381 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 1,475 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

Chile ranks 8th and Jamaica ranks 10th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Jamaica in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 1,585 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,871 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,286 1000 SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 1,773 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,957 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,184 1000 SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 2,154 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,905 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,751 1000 SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 3,345 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,942 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,597 1000 SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 4,922 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6,036 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,115 1000 SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 6,256 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,826 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,430 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
2020s 6,731 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,180 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,551 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chile or Jamaica?
Chile, at 6,856 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 5,381 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chile and Jamaica?
1,475 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Jamaica rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chile ranks 8th and Jamaica ranks 10th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Jamaica: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/chile/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/chile/jamaica/">Chile vs Jamaica: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,778 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.