Belarus vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Belarus
2.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
2.75 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
117th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
116th

Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Belarus
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
02.557.51012.5199320082023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 2.75 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 2.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 117th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 116th of 140 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1990s 1.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1264 1000 SLC per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 1.75 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.75 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2 1000 SLC per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 2.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7.17 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.7 1000 SLC per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 2.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5773 1000 SLC per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Belarus or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 2.75 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 2.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Belarus and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Belarus ranks 117th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 116th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/belarus/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/belarus/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Belarus vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,778 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.