Australia vs Namibia: Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Australia
0.6701 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.6809 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
128th
Namibia rank
127th

Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Australia
  • Namibia
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.6809 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.6701 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0108 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 128th and Namibia ranks 127th of 140 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2878 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.036 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2518 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.3179 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0461 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2719 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.3338 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0592 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2746 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.4014 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0853 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3161 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2892 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2408 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.5532 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.4992 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.054 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.6757 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.6656 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0101 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Australia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.6809 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.6701 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Australia and Namibia?
0.0108 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Namibia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Australia ranks 128th and Namibia ranks 127th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Namibia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/australia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/australia/namibia/">Australia vs Namibia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,778 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.