Equatorial Guinea vs Guinea-Bissau: Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value (constant) … capita SLC

Equatorial Guinea
9.27 1000 SLC per person
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau
7.73 1000 SLC per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
27th
Guinea-Bissau rank
29th

Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value (constant) … capita SLC over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Guinea-Bissau
05101520196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 9.27 1000 SLC per person against 7.73 1000 SLC per person in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 1.54 1000 SLC per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Guinea-Bissau's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 27th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 29th of 140 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 11.62 1000 SLC per person 1.08 1000 SLC per person 10.54 1000 SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 10.54 1000 SLC per person 1.43 1000 SLC per person 9.12 1000 SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 10.14 1000 SLC per person 3.91 1000 SLC per person 6.23 1000 SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 18.66 1000 SLC per person 7.57 1000 SLC per person 11.08 1000 SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 15.13 1000 SLC per person 7.74 1000 SLC per person 7.39 1000 SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 11.59 1000 SLC per person 8.94 1000 SLC per person 2.65 1000 SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 9.75 1000 SLC per person 8.07 1000 SLC per person 1.67 1000 SLC per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Equatorial Guinea or Guinea-Bissau?
Equatorial Guinea, at 9.27 1000 SLC per person against 7.73 1000 SLC per person in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau?
1.54 1000 SLC per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 27th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 29th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Guinea-Bissau: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/guinea-bissau/">Equatorial Guinea vs Guinea-Bissau: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per capita
Unit
1000 SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,915 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.