New Caledonia vs United Arab Emirates: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

New Caledonia
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
United Arab Emirates
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
143rd
United Arab Emirates rank
142nd

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • New Caledonia
  • United Arab Emirates
00000196519942024

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 143rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 142nd of 169 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and United Arab Emirates in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1970s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1980s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1990s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP United Arab Emirates
2000s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP United Arab Emirates
2010s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP United Arab Emirates
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), New Caledonia or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between New Caledonia and United Arab Emirates?
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and United Arab Emirates?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
New Caledonia ranks 143rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 142nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs United Arab Emirates: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/united-arab-emirates/">New Caledonia vs United Arab Emirates: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,179 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.