Equatorial Guinea vs Malaysia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Equatorial Guinea
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malaysia
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
122nd
Malaysia rank
121st

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Malaysia
0000196119922024

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Malaysia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd and Malaysia ranks 121st of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Malaysia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Malaysia
1970s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Malaysia
1980s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Malaysia
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Equatorial Guinea or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Equatorial Guinea and Malaysia?
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Malaysia?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Malaysia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd and Malaysia ranks 121st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Malaysia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/malaysia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Malaysia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,179 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.