Yemen vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Yemen
1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Yemen rank
120th
Zimbabwe rank
121st

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Yemen
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Yemen currently reports 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Yemen has been ahead every year.

Yemen ranks 120th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 170 countries.

Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Yemen Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1462 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0594 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Yemen
1970s 0.193 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0886 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Yemen
1980s 0.3717 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2437 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Yemen
1990s 0.5336 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3509 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Yemen
2000s 0.941 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2558 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6852 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Yemen
2010s 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5803 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5829 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Yemen
2020s 1.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Yemen

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Yemen or Zimbabwe?
Yemen, at 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Yemen and Zimbabwe?
0.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Yemen ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Yemen and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Yemen and Zimbabwe rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Yemen ranks 120th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Yemen vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/yemen-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/yemen-rep/zimbabwe/">Yemen vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.