Pakistan vs Romania: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Pakistan
6.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
6.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
55th
Romania rank
54th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Pakistan
  • Romania
051015196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 6.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 6.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 0.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Pakistan ranks 55th and Romania ranks 54th of 170 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1970s 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1980s 2.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1990s 3.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2000s 4.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2010s 4.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2020s 6.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Pakistan or Romania?
Romania, at 6.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 6.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Pakistan and Romania?
0.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Romania?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Romania rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Pakistan ranks 55th and Romania ranks 54th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Romania: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/romania/">Pakistan vs Romania: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.