Norway vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Norway
0.0874 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
162nd
Zambia rank
161st

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Norway
  • Zambia
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0874 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 162nd and Zambia ranks 161st of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2791 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0318 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2473 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.305 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0427 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2624 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.3557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0645 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2913 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.2183 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0745 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.0955 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0768 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0187 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.0851 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0839 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.0813 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Norway or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0874 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Norway and Zambia?
0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and Zambia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Norway ranks 162nd and Zambia ranks 161st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/norway/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/norway/zambia/">Norway vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.