Namibia vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Namibia
0.0571 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
164th
Zambia rank
161st

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Namibia
  • Zambia
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0571 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0318 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.6 times Namibia's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 164th and Zambia ranks 161st of 170 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0318 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0427 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0388 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0645 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0595 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0745 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0694 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.0324 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0768 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0445 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.0418 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0839 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0421 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.0557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0328 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Namibia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0571 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Namibia and Zambia?
0.0318 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Zambia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Namibia ranks 164th and Zambia ranks 161st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zambia/">Namibia vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.