Namibia vs Norway: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Namibia
0.0571 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.0874 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
164th
Norway rank
162nd

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Namibia
  • Norway
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.0874 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0571 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0303 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.5 times Namibia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 164th and Norway ranks 162nd of 170 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2791 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2761 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.305 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.0049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3508 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1189 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.0251 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0919 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0668 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.0418 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0851 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0433 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.0557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0813 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0256 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Namibia or Norway?
Norway, at 0.0874 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0571 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Namibia and Norway?
0.0303 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Norway rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Namibia ranks 164th and Norway ranks 162nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Norway: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/namibia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/namibia/norway/">Namibia vs Norway: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.