Lebanon vs Rwanda: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Lebanon
60.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
36.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lebanon rank
3rd
Rwanda rank
6th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Lebanon
  • Rwanda
20406080196119922023

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 60.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 36.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 24.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.7 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lebanon ahead.

Lebanon ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 6th of 170 countries.

Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 28.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 18.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Lebanon
1970s 37.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 25.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Lebanon
1980s 49.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 34.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Lebanon
1990s 76.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 37.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 39.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Lebanon
2000s 51.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 38.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Lebanon
2010s 55.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 35.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 20.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Lebanon
2020s 56.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 34.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 22.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Lebanon or Rwanda?
Lebanon, at 60.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 36.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Lebanon and Rwanda?
24.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lebanon and Rwanda rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Lebanon ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 6th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lebanon vs Rwanda: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/lebanon/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/lebanon/rwanda/">Lebanon vs Rwanda: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.