Israel vs Rwanda: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Israel
40.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
36.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel rank
5th
Rwanda rank
6th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Israel
  • Rwanda
1020304050196119922023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 40.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 36.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 4.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.

Israel ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 6th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 22.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 18.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel
1970s 36.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 25.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel
1980s 39.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 34.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel
1990s 36.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 37.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2336 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 35.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 38.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 33.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 35.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 38.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 34.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Israel or Rwanda?
Israel, at 40.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 36.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Israel and Rwanda?
4.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Israel and Rwanda rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Israel ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 6th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Rwanda: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/israel/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/israel/rwanda/">Israel vs Rwanda: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.