Guatemala vs Malawi: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Guatemala
19.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
20.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
19th
Malawi rank
16th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Malawi
0510152025196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 20.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 19.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 19th and Malawi ranks 16th of 170 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 1.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 2.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9854 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 3.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 7.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 12.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 20.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 23.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 19.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Guatemala or Malawi?
Malawi, at 20.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 19.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Guatemala and Malawi?
0.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Malawi rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Guatemala ranks 19th and Malawi ranks 16th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Malawi: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/malawi/">Guatemala vs Malawi: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.