Fiji vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Fiji
1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Fiji rank
123rd
Zimbabwe rank
121st

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Fiji
  • Zimbabwe
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Fiji, a difference of 0.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.

Fiji ranks 123rd and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1926 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0594 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Fiji
1970s 0.1841 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0886 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0955 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Fiji
1980s 0.2788 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1508 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Fiji
1990s 0.3302 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1475 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Fiji
2000s 0.4411 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2558 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1853 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Fiji
2010s 0.5328 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5803 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0475 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.9491 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1699 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Fiji or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Fiji as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Fiji and Zimbabwe?
0.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Fiji and Zimbabwe rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Fiji ranks 123rd and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fiji vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/fiji/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/fiji/zimbabwe/">Fiji vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.