Egypt vs Tunisia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Egypt
9.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
8.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
43rd
Tunisia rank
46th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Egypt
  • Tunisia
0246810196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 9.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 8.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Egypt ranks 43rd and Tunisia ranks 46th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 1.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7606 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 2.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6739 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 3.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1992 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 5.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6903 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 7.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.955 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 8.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6377 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Egypt or Tunisia?
Egypt, at 9.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 8.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Egypt and Tunisia?
1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Tunisia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Egypt ranks 43rd and Tunisia ranks 46th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Tunisia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/tunisia/">Egypt vs Tunisia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.