Cuba vs South Africa: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Cuba
4.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
3.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
84th
South Africa rank
87th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Cuba
  • South Africa
02.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 4.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 84th and South Africa ranks 87th of 170 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 1.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9317 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6401 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 2.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 4.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 5.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 9.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 8.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 6.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Cuba or South Africa?
Cuba, at 4.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Cuba and South Africa?
0.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and South Africa rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Cuba ranks 84th and South Africa ranks 87th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs South Africa: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cuba/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cuba/south-africa/">Cuba vs South Africa: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.