China vs Ecuador: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

China
13.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
13.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
34th
Ecuador rank
31st

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • China
  • Ecuador
051015196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 13.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 13.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

China ranks 34th and Ecuador ranks 31st of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.5191 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 3.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 6.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 10.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 12.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1623 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), China or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 13.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 13.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between China and Ecuador?
0.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Ecuador rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
China ranks 34th and Ecuador ranks 31st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Ecuador: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/ecuador/">China vs Ecuador: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.