Chile vs Sri Lanka: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chile
7.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
7.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
51st
Sri Lanka rank
49th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chile
  • Sri Lanka
02.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 7.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Chile ranks 51st and Sri Lanka ranks 49th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 1.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 1.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 3.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 4.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3526 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 6.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6908 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 7.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chile or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 7.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chile and Sri Lanka?
0.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Sri Lanka rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chile ranks 51st and Sri Lanka ranks 49th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sri Lanka: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/sri-lanka/">Chile vs Sri Lanka: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.