Chile vs El Salvador: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chile
7.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
7.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
51st
El Salvador rank
53rd

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chile
  • El Salvador
246810196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 7.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

Chile ranks 51st and El Salvador ranks 53rd of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 1.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 1.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 3.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 4.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 6.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 7.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.211 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chile or El Salvador?
Chile, at 7.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chile and El Salvador?
0.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and El Salvador rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chile ranks 51st and El Salvador ranks 53rd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs El Salvador: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/el-salvador/">Chile vs El Salvador: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.