Chad vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chad
0.0593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
163rd
Zambia rank
161st

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chad
  • Zambia
0.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0296 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.5 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 163rd and Zambia ranks 161st of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0318 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.0442 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0427 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.0509 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0645 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0136 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.0519 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0745 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0225 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0768 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0248 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.0562 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0839 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0277 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chad or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chad and Zambia?
0.0296 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Zambia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chad ranks 163rd and Zambia ranks 161st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chad/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chad/zambia/">Chad vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.