Chad vs Norway: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chad
0.0593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.0874 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
163rd
Norway rank
162nd

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chad
  • Norway
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.0874 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0281 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.5 times Chad's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 163rd and Norway ranks 162nd of 170 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2791 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.244 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.0442 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.305 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2608 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.0509 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.0515 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1475 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0959 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.0516 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0919 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0402 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.0562 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0851 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0813 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chad or Norway?
Norway, at 0.0874 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chad and Norway?
0.0281 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Norway?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Norway rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chad ranks 163rd and Norway ranks 162nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Norway: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chad/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chad/norway/">Chad vs Norway: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.