Chad vs Mauritania: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chad
0.0593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
0.0228 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
163rd
Mauritania rank
165th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chad
  • Mauritania
0.010.020.030.040.050.06196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0228 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0365 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 2.6 times Mauritania's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 163rd and Mauritania ranks 165th of 170 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0158 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0193 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.0442 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0321 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.0509 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0381 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.0515 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0158 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0357 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2000s 0.0516 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0214 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0303 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2010s 0.0562 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0341 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2020s 0.059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0361 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chad or Mauritania?
Chad, at 0.0593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0228 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chad and Mauritania?
0.0365 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mauritania?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Mauritania rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chad ranks 163rd and Mauritania ranks 165th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Mauritania: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chad/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chad/mauritania/">Chad vs Mauritania: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.