Central African Republic vs Latvia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Central African Republic
0.1188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0.1129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
154th
Latvia rank
155th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Latvia
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.1188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 154th and Latvia ranks 155th of 170 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8574 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7408 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0.1111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5326 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0.1151 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0449 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1848 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0669 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Central African Republic or Latvia?
Central African Republic, at 0.1188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Central African Republic and Latvia?
0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Latvia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Central African Republic ranks 154th and Latvia ranks 155th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Latvia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/latvia/">Central African Republic vs Latvia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.