Canada vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Canada
0.1092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
158th
Zambia rank
161st

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Canada
  • Zambia
0.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0.1092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0203 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 158th and Zambia ranks 161st of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0447 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0318 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0.0469 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0427 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
1980s 0.0573 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0645 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.0619 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0745 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.0784 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0768 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
2010s 0.1045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0839 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0206 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
2020s 0.1105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Canada or Zambia?
Canada, at 0.1092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0889 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Canada and Zambia?
0.0203 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Zambia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Canada ranks 158th and Zambia ranks 161st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/canada/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/canada/zambia/">Canada vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.