Cameroon vs Nepal: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Cameroon
5.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
5.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
71st
Nepal rank
69th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Cameroon
  • Nepal
0246196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 5.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 5.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cameroon, a difference of 0.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 71st and Nepal ranks 69th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.757 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2994 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4576 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cameroon
1970s 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3671 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6969 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cameroon
1980s 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8896 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.634 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cameroon
1990s 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2000s 2.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7957 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2010s 4.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7235 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 5.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.381 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Cameroon or Nepal?
Nepal, at 5.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 5.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Cameroon and Nepal?
0.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Nepal rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Cameroon ranks 71st and Nepal ranks 69th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Nepal: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/nepal/">Cameroon vs Nepal: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.