Bhutan vs Libya: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Bhutan
0.2937 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya
0.2212 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
148th
Libya rank
150th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Libya
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.2937 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2212 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 0.0725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.3 times Libya's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 148th and Libya ranks 150th of 170 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1506 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0371 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1136 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 0.1917 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.3048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1234 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1814 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.4479 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1627 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2852 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 0.4963 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 0.5552 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3444 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.3023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2186 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0837 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Bhutan or Libya?
Bhutan, at 0.2937 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2212 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Bhutan and Libya?
0.0725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Libya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Libya rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Bhutan ranks 148th and Libya ranks 150th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Libya: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/libya/">Bhutan vs Libya: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.