Barbados vs Pakistan: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Barbados
6.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
6.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
57th
Pakistan rank
55th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Barbados
  • Pakistan
0246196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 6.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 6.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 57th and Pakistan ranks 55th of 170 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 3.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 3.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 3.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 3.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 4.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0501 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 5.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.669 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 6.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Barbados or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 6.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 6.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Barbados and Pakistan?
0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Pakistan rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Barbados ranks 57th and Pakistan ranks 55th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Pakistan: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/barbados/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/barbados/pakistan/">Barbados vs Pakistan: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.