Angola vs Nicaragua: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Angola
2.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
1.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
106th
Nicaragua rank
107th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Angola
  • Nicaragua
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 2.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Angola ranks 106th and Nicaragua ranks 107th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0981 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5119 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 0.1293 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8591 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7298 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 0.1265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7742 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 0.131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7891 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.658 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 0.3526 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3602 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 1.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0658 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
2020s 1.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Angola or Nicaragua?
Angola, at 2.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Angola and Nicaragua?
0.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Nicaragua rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Angola ranks 106th and Nicaragua ranks 107th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Nicaragua: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/nicaragua/">Angola vs Nicaragua: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.