Angola vs Bahamas: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Angola
2.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas
2.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
106th
Bahamas rank
105th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Angola
  • Bahamas
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 2.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 106th and Bahamas ranks 105th of 170 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Bahamas Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0981 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3326 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2345 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1970s 0.1293 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4714 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3422 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1980s 0.1265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5614 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4349 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 0.131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8737 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7426 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 0.3526 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 1.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7647 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 1.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.296 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Angola or Bahamas?
Bahamas, at 2.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Angola and Bahamas?
0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Bahamas?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Bahamas rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Angola ranks 106th and Bahamas ranks 105th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Bahamas: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/bahamas-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/bahamas-the/">Angola vs Bahamas: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.