Egypt vs Sao Tome and Principe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Egypt
0.0845 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0832 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Egypt rank
41st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
42nd

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Egypt
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.020.040.060.080.1196119922024

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 0.0845 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0832 1000 Int$ per person in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0013 1000 Int$ per person.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 41st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 42nd of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 4 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.036 1000 Int$ per person 0.021 1000 Int$ per person 0.0151 1000 Int$ per person Egypt
1970s 0.0374 1000 Int$ per person 0.0135 1000 Int$ per person 0.0239 1000 Int$ per person Egypt
1980s 0.0429 1000 Int$ per person 0.0222 1000 Int$ per person 0.0208 1000 Int$ per person Egypt
1990s 0.0558 1000 Int$ per person 0.0477 1000 Int$ per person 0.0081 1000 Int$ per person Egypt
2000s 0.071 1000 Int$ per person 0.0722 1000 Int$ per person 0.0011 1000 Int$ per person Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.0774 1000 Int$ per person 0.0824 1000 Int$ per person 0.005 1000 Int$ per person Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.0805 1000 Int$ per person 0.0868 1000 Int$ per person 0.0063 1000 Int$ per person Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Egypt or Sao Tome and Principe?
Egypt, at 0.0845 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0832 1000 Int$ per person in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Egypt and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0013 1000 Int$ per person, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Sao Tome and Principe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Egypt and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Egypt ranks 41st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 42nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Sao Tome and Principe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/egypt-arab-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/egypt-arab-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/">Egypt vs Sao Tome and Principe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,864 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.