Australia vs Papua New Guinea: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Australia
0.1 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
0.1062 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Australia rank
29th
Papua New Guinea rank
27th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Australia
  • Papua New Guinea
00.050.10.15196119922024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.1062 1000 Int$ per person against 0.1 1000 Int$ per person in Australia, a difference of 0.0062 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Australia ranks 29th and Papua New Guinea ranks 27th of 170 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0936 1000 Int$ per person 0.1573 1000 Int$ per person 0.0637 1000 Int$ per person Papua New Guinea
1970s 0.0882 1000 Int$ per person 0.1645 1000 Int$ per person 0.0763 1000 Int$ per person Papua New Guinea
1980s 0.0855 1000 Int$ per person 0.1528 1000 Int$ per person 0.0673 1000 Int$ per person Papua New Guinea
1990s 0.0879 1000 Int$ per person 0.148 1000 Int$ per person 0.0601 1000 Int$ per person Papua New Guinea
2000s 0.1169 1000 Int$ per person 0.1328 1000 Int$ per person 0.0159 1000 Int$ per person Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.1006 1000 Int$ per person 0.1231 1000 Int$ per person 0.0225 1000 Int$ per person Papua New Guinea
2020s 0.1033 1000 Int$ per person 0.1094 1000 Int$ per person 0.0061 1000 Int$ per person Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Australia or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.1062 1000 Int$ per person against 0.1 1000 Int$ per person in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Australia and Papua New Guinea?
0.0062 1000 Int$ per person, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Papua New Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Australia ranks 29th and Papua New Guinea ranks 27th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Papua New Guinea: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/australia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/australia/papua-new-guinea/">Australia vs Papua New Guinea: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,864 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.