Guinea-Bissau vs Tokelau: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Guinea-Bissau
0.0743 % change on previous year
in 2024
Tokelau
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
121st
Tokelau rank
124th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Tokelau
-10010203040196219932024

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0743 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Tokelau, a difference of 0.0743 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Tokelau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 121st and Tokelau ranks 124th of 212 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 6 and Tokelau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Tokelau Difference Ahead
1960s 0.595 % change on previous year 1.85 % change on previous year 1.26 % change on previous year Tokelau
1970s 2.05 % change on previous year 0.4034 % change on previous year 1.65 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
1980s 3.37 % change on previous year 0.3617 % change on previous year 3.01 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
1990s 1.97 % change on previous year -4.69 % change on previous year 6.66 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
2000s 2.31 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 2.31 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
2010s 2.17 % change on previous year 0.0421 % change on previous year 2.13 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.0265 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0.0265 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Guinea-Bissau or Tokelau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0743 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Tokelau as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Guinea-Bissau and Tokelau?
0.0743 % change on previous year, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Tokelau?
55 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Tokelau rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 121st and Tokelau ranks 124th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Tokelau: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/guinea-bissau/tokelau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/guinea-bissau/tokelau/">Guinea-Bissau vs Tokelau: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
242 places, 13,721 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.