Afghanistan vs Namibia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Afghanistan
2.15 % change on previous year
in 2024
Namibia
2.37 % change on previous year
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
69th
Namibia rank
67th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Namibia
-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 2.37 % change on previous year against 2.15 % change on previous year in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.22 % change on previous year.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 26 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Namibia ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 69th and Namibia ranks 67th of 212 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 6.26 % change on previous year 2.38 % change on previous year 3.88 % change on previous year Afghanistan
1970s 0.6656 % change on previous year 2.98 % change on previous year 2.32 % change on previous year Namibia
1980s -1.85 % change on previous year 2.36 % change on previous year 4.22 % change on previous year Namibia
1990s 1.18 % change on previous year 9.8 % change on previous year 8.62 % change on previous year Namibia
2000s 3.28 % change on previous year 11.16 % change on previous year 7.88 % change on previous year Namibia
2010s 7.72 % change on previous year 4.41 % change on previous year 3.3 % change on previous year Afghanistan
2020s 3.42 % change on previous year 3.4 % change on previous year 0.0233 % change on previous year Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Afghanistan or Namibia?
Namibia, at 2.37 % change on previous year against 2.15 % change on previous year in Afghanistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Afghanistan and Namibia?
0.22 % change on previous year, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Afghanistan and Namibia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Afghanistan ranks 69th and Namibia ranks 67th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Namibia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/afghanistan/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/afghanistan/namibia/">Afghanistan vs Namibia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
242 places, 13,721 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.