Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Forest area (sq. km)
Forest area (sq. km) over time
- Mauritius
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 552.8 sq. km against 382.9 sq. km in Mauritius, a difference of 169.9 sq. km.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.4 times Mauritius's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 169th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 166th of 214 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 414.57 sq. km | 588.32 sq. km | 173.75 sq. km | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2000s | 403.24 sq. km | 582.97 sq. km | 179.73 sq. km | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 383.16 sq. km | 559.45 sq. km | 176.29 sq. km | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 382.9 sq. km | 552.15 sq. km | 169.25 sq. km | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Mauritius or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 552.8 sq. km against 382.9 sq. km in Mauritius as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area between Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 169.9 sq. km, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for forest area?
- Mauritius ranks 169th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 166th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.