Luxembourg vs Micronesia (country): Forest area (sq. km)
Luxembourg
887 sq. km
in 2025
Micronesia (country)
645.7 sq. km
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
161st
Micronesia (country) rank
163rd
Forest area (sq. km) over time
- Luxembourg
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 887 sq. km against 645.7 sq. km in Micronesia (country), a difference of 241.3 sq. km.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.4 times Micronesia (country)'s.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 161st and Micronesia (country) ranks 163rd of 214 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 876 sq. km | 639.82 sq. km | 236.18 sq. km | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 887 sq. km | 642.58 sq. km | 244.42 sq. km | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 887 sq. km | 644.95 sq. km | 242.05 sq. km | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Luxembourg or Micronesia (country)?
- Luxembourg, at 887 sq. km against 645.7 sq. km in Micronesia (country) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area between Luxembourg and Micronesia (country)?
- 241.3 sq. km, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Micronesia (country)?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Luxembourg and Micronesia (country) rank globally for forest area?
- Luxembourg ranks 161st and Micronesia (country) ranks 163rd of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.