Lower middle income vs Myanmar: Forest area
Forest area over time
- Lower middle income
- Myanmar
How they compare
Lower middle income currently reports 5.71 million sq. km against 276,748 sq. km in Myanmar, a difference of 5.43 million sq. km.
That makes Lower middle income's figure about 20.6 times Myanmar's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Lower middle income has been ahead every year.
Lower middle income ranks 23rd and Myanmar ranks 22nd of 45 groups.
Lower middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lower middle income | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.39 million sq. km | 372,608 sq. km | 6.02 million sq. km | Lower middle income |
| 2000s | 6.16 million sq. km | 333,259 sq. km | 5.83 million sq. km | Lower middle income |
| 2010s | 5.92 million sq. km | 301,373 sq. km | 5.61 million sq. km | Lower middle income |
| 2020s | 5.74 million sq. km | 281,094 sq. km | 5.46 million sq. km | Lower middle income |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Lower middle income or Myanmar?
- Lower middle income, at 5.71 million sq. km against 276,748 sq. km in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest area between Lower middle income and Myanmar?
- 5.43 million sq. km, with Lower middle income ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Myanmar?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Lower middle income and Myanmar rank globally for forest area?
- Lower middle income ranks 23rd and Myanmar ranks 22nd of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.