Lithuania vs Malawi: Forest area

Lithuania
22,054 sq. km
in 2023
Malawi
21,157 sq. km
in 2023
Lithuania rank
102nd
Malawi rank
105th

Forest area over time

  • Lithuania
  • Malawi
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199020062023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 22,054 sq. km against 21,157 sq. km in Malawi, a difference of 897 sq. km.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malawi ahead.

Lithuania ranks 102nd and Malawi ranks 105th of 213 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 19,862 sq. km 32,707 sq. km 12,844 sq. km Malawi
2000s 20,875 sq. km 28,927 sq. km 8,052 sq. km Malawi
2010s 21,855 sq. km 24,727 sq. km 2,872 sq. km Malawi
2020s 22,032 sq. km 21,787 sq. km 245.42 sq. km Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area, Lithuania or Malawi?
Lithuania, at 22,054 sq. km against 21,157 sq. km in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest area between Lithuania and Malawi?
897 sq. km, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Malawi?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Malawi rank globally for forest area?
Lithuania ranks 102nd and Malawi ranks 105th of 213 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Forest area (sq. km)
Unit
sq. km
Source
FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
261 places, 8,639 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.