Latvia vs Serbia: Forest area (sq. km)
Latvia
34,670 sq. km
in 2025
Serbia
34,752 sq. km
in 2025
Latvia rank
85th
Serbia rank
84th
Forest area (sq. km) over time
- Latvia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 34,752 sq. km against 34,670 sq. km in Latvia, a difference of 82 sq. km.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 85th and Serbia ranks 84th of 214 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33,393 sq. km | 27,808 sq. km | 5,586 sq. km | Latvia |
| 2010s | 33,978 sq. km | 30,586 sq. km | 3,392 sq. km | Latvia |
| 2020s | 34,505 sq. km | 33,760 sq. km | 745.45 sq. km | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Latvia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 34,752 sq. km against 34,670 sq. km in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area between Latvia and Serbia?
- 82 sq. km, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Serbia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Serbia rank globally for forest area?
- Latvia ranks 85th and Serbia ranks 84th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.