Latvia vs Pakistan: Forest area
Latvia
34,224 sq. km
in 2023
Pakistan
36,019 sq. km
in 2023
Latvia rank
85th
Pakistan rank
82nd
Forest area over time
- Latvia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 36,019 sq. km against 34,224 sq. km in Latvia, a difference of 1,795 sq. km.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 85th and Pakistan ranks 82nd of 213 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32,104 sq. km | 47,252 sq. km | 15,148 sq. km | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 33,000 sq. km | 43,234 sq. km | 10,234 sq. km | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 33,895 sq. km | 39,373 sq. km | 5,478 sq. km | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 34,166 sq. km | 36,639 sq. km | 2,473 sq. km | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Latvia or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 36,019 sq. km against 34,224 sq. km in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest area between Latvia and Pakistan?
- 1,795 sq. km, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Pakistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Pakistan rank globally for forest area?
- Latvia ranks 85th and Pakistan ranks 82nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.