Kazakhstan, Republic of vs Latvia: Forest area
Kazakhstan, Republic of
35,424 sq. km
in 2023
Latvia
34,224 sq. km
in 2023
Kazakhstan, Republic of rank
83rd
Latvia rank
85th
Forest area over time
- Kazakhstan, Republic of
- Latvia
How they compare
Kazakhstan, Republic of currently reports 35,424 sq. km against 34,224 sq. km in Latvia, a difference of 1,200 sq. km.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 83rd and Latvia ranks 85th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan, Republic of | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31,593 sq. km | 32,104 sq. km | 510.8 sq. km | Latvia |
| 2000s | 31,233 sq. km | 33,000 sq. km | 1,767 sq. km | Latvia |
| 2010s | 32,698 sq. km | 33,895 sq. km | 1,197 sq. km | Latvia |
| 2020s | 34,985 sq. km | 34,166 sq. km | 819.45 sq. km | Kazakhstan, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Kazakhstan, Republic of or Latvia?
- Kazakhstan, Republic of, at 35,424 sq. km against 34,224 sq. km in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest area between Kazakhstan, Republic of and Latvia?
- 1,200 sq. km, with Kazakhstan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan, Republic of and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan, Republic of and Latvia rank globally for forest area?
- Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 83rd and Latvia ranks 85th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.