Eswatini vs Syrian Arab Republic: Forest area
Eswatini
5,012 sq. km
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic
5,221 sq. km
in 2023
Eswatini rank
140th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
138th
Forest area over time
- Eswatini
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 5,221 sq. km against 5,012 sq. km in Eswatini, a difference of 209 sq. km.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 140th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 138th of 213 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Syrian Arab Republic in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,666 sq. km | 3,991 sq. km | 675.23 sq. km | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 4,787 sq. km | 4,591 sq. km | 196.68 sq. km | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 4,909 sq. km | 5,131 sq. km | 221.87 sq. km | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2020s | 4,994 sq. km | 5,221 sq. km | 226.85 sq. km | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Eswatini or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 5,221 sq. km against 5,012 sq. km in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest area between Eswatini and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 209 sq. km, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for forest area?
- Eswatini ranks 140th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 138th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.