East Asia & Pacific vs Zambia: Forest area (sq. km)
Forest area (sq. km) over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Zambia
How they compare
East Asia & Pacific currently reports 6.66 million sq. km against 448,743 sq. km in Zambia, a difference of 6.22 million sq. km.
That makes East Asia & Pacific's figure about 14.9 times Zambia's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, East Asia & Pacific has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 17th and Zambia ranks 18th of 47 groups.
East Asia & Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.38 million sq. km | 472,509 sq. km | 5.91 million sq. km | East Asia & Pacific |
| 2000s | 6.43 million sq. km | 468,929 sq. km | 5.96 million sq. km | East Asia & Pacific |
| 2010s | 6.58 million sq. km | 459,584 sq. km | 6.12 million sq. km | East Asia & Pacific |
| 2020s | 6.65 million sq. km | 452,144 sq. km | 6.20 million sq. km | East Asia & Pacific |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, East Asia & Pacific or Zambia?
- East Asia & Pacific, at 6.66 million sq. km against 448,743 sq. km in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest area between East Asia & Pacific and Zambia?
- 6.22 million sq. km, with East Asia & Pacific ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Zambia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Zambia rank globally for forest area?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 17th and Zambia ranks 18th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.