East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs South Africa: Forest area (sq. km)

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
4.90 million sq. km
in 2023
South Africa
228,814 sq. km
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
28th
South Africa rank
27th

Forest area (sq. km) over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • South Africa
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M199020072025

How they compare

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) currently reports 4.90 million sq. km against 228,814 sq. km in South Africa, a difference of 4.67 million sq. km.

That makes East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s figure about 21.4 times South Africa's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 28th and South Africa ranks 27th of 47 groups.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 4.63 million sq. km 202,106 sq. km 4.42 million sq. km East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2000s 4.70 million sq. km 210,863 sq. km 4.49 million sq. km East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2010s 4.83 million sq. km 219,620 sq. km 4.61 million sq. km East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2020s 4.89 million sq. km 225,750 sq. km 4.66 million sq. km East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or South Africa?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), at 4.90 million sq. km against 228,814 sq. km in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest area between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and South Africa?
4.67 million sq. km, with East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and South Africa?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and South Africa rank globally for forest area?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 28th and South Africa ranks 27th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs South Africa: Forest area. Statizoid, drawing on FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-sq-km/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-sq-km/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/south-africa/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs South Africa: Forest area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area (sq. km)
Unit
sq. km
Source
FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
262 places, 9,089 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.