Chile vs Low income: Forest area
Chile
185,794 sq. km
in 2023
Low income
2.92 million sq. km
in 2023
Chile rank
35th
Low income rank
30th
Forest area over time
- Chile
- Low income
How they compare
Low income currently reports 2.92 million sq. km against 185,794 sq. km in Chile, a difference of 2.73 million sq. km.
That makes Low income's figure about 15.7 times Chile's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Low income has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 35th and Low income ranks 30th of 215 countries.
Low income has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Low income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 155,030 sq. km | 3.07 million sq. km | 2.92 million sq. km | Low income |
| 2000s | 162,258 sq. km | 2.99 million sq. km | 2.83 million sq. km | Low income |
| 2010s | 174,578 sq. km | 3.04 million sq. km | 2.86 million sq. km | Low income |
| 2020s | 183,950 sq. km | 2.95 million sq. km | 2.77 million sq. km | Low income |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Chile or Low income?
- Low income, at 2.92 million sq. km against 185,794 sq. km in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest area between Chile and Low income?
- 2.73 million sq. km, with Low income ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Low income?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Low income rank globally for forest area?
- Chile ranks 35th and Low income ranks 30th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.