Cape Verde vs Palau: Forest area

Cape Verde
466.2 sq. km
in 2023
Palau
416.5 sq. km
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
167th
Palau rank
169th

Forest area over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Palau
200300400500199020062023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 466.2 sq. km against 416.5 sq. km in Palau, a difference of 49.7 sq. km.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Palau's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Palau ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 167th and Palau ranks 169th of 213 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 3 and Palau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Palau Difference Ahead
1990s 275.5 sq. km 388.65 sq. km 113.15 sq. km Palau
2000s 410.7 sq. km 400.21 sq. km 10.49 sq. km Cape Verde
2010s 440.7 sq. km 409.47 sq. km 31.23 sq. km Cape Verde
2020s 461.7 sq. km 415.3 sq. km 46.4 sq. km Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area, Cape Verde or Palau?
Cape Verde, at 466.2 sq. km against 416.5 sq. km in Palau as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest area between Cape Verde and Palau?
49.7 sq. km, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Palau?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Palau rank globally for forest area?
Cape Verde ranks 167th and Palau ranks 169th of 213 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Forest area (sq. km)
Unit
sq. km
Source
FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
261 places, 8,639 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.